- High levels of solar radiation. This has negatively impacted the survival of humans because if not properly equipped to tolerate the radiation, it can cause illness and death.
- Short term - sunburnFacultative – skin tanningDevelopmental – dark photo-protective pigmentationCultural – Sunblock
- The benefits of studying human variation over environmental clines is that it gives a greater understanding to the origin of variations. How the variation began, and why it changed.
- Looking at race to explain the variation to high levels of radiation does not paint a clear picture. As race is the product of this environmental cline, not the other way around.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Huma Variation & Race
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Language
Part 1
I would not say that I found this
experiment easy, but it was not that difficult. When I speak I am
very animated, so although I had to remove the words, the gestures
remained and I was still able to communicate my point for the most
part. My partner was able to understand me, and he thought it was
quite fun. It was like playing charades (which we enjoy). I will
admit that he may have had an upper hand because he is my boyfriend
and has had to learn how to learn how to translate my non-verbal
communication.
If we were two different cultures
meeting for the first time, I believe that I would have the upper
hand. Words are not effective when attempting to communicate with
someone from a different culture or who speaks a different language.
Body language however, and facial expressions, are pretty much the
same across the board. Effectively communicating with the absence of
words is advantageous. The speaking culture may be frustrated,
because they find symbolic language easier, as my partner did at the
beginning of our exercise. But after they begin to think bigger-
think outside of their box- they will see that alternate ways of
communicating are just as effective. It is a bit like those with more
severe cases of autism. Speaking can be quite difficult. So those who
work with them have to think of alternate ways of communicating.
Part 2
I was not able to last the full 15
minutes using only speech. I tried, but controlling my facial
movements seemed impossible. I sat on my hand and stared in one spot
so that I could keep myself from making hand gestures or body
movements, but that did not keep the tone of my voice steady. My
partner had a hard time understanding me, as I can be quite
sarcastic, but without the inflection in my voice he could not tell
if I was being sarcastic or not. This experiment clearly demonstrated
the importance of “signs” in our language. When I initially
thought of non-speech language techniques, only hand gestures and
shoulder shrugs came to mind. This clarified the vast amount of
non-speech language used in conversing, and the important role they
play in effective communication.
I know from personal experience that
there are people who have a difficulty reading body language. This is
a setback. Reading body language is important for many reasons, one
of which is honesty. For myself in particular, my non-speech language
keeps me honest, because it always tells the truth. Being able to
read the body-language of others can make you a human lie detector.
Lastly, to me, reading body language is always beneficial.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Piltdown Hoax
1. The Piltdown hoax occurred in Piltdown, England. The fossil was discovered in December of 1912 by Charles Dawson, however, the hoax was not exposed until 1953. Dawson brought this find to Arthur Smith Woodward. This discovery affected the scientific community because it was said to be the missing link between apes and humans. This find proved that man formed the large brain prior to walking upright.
After World War II, accurate testing for fossil aging was discovered. The flourine content of the find was tested, and the results showed that the bones were only 100,000 years old. In 1953, a ful scale analysis began, and it was found that the bones had been stained, pieces cut, and teeth filed. The jaw bone was actually only 100 years old and came from a female Orangutan.
Before this discovery, scientists found fossils in other areas that did not match the Piltdown finding and believed there to be a misconnect. However, allegations were never brought forth.
2. In this case, national pride negatively impacted the scientific pride. In general, just taking into account the human factor, self-pride, self-interest, the desire for fame and recognition, among other reasons, can make science unreliable. There is a need for obscure objectivity in science, which including the human side, can make science unreliable.
3. Positive aspects of the scientific process that were responsible for revealing the skull fraud included modern advances in fossil age testing, more development in the difference in fraudulent staining and natural staining, and being able to notice the difference in natural teeth grinding patterns and fake ones. Another aspect of the scientific process is comparison. Comparing the differences between fossils found elsewhere brought about the questioning of the Piltdown man.
4. I do not believe it is possible to remove the "human" factor from science. It can be reduced, but as long as a human is involved, there will be human error. Humans create the technology that helps prove that these fossils are a certain age, or ground a certain way; so humans can beat it. If there were a way to exclude the human factor in regards to error and fraud, I would definitely want to remove it from science. However, to removed the human factor from potential fraud, would also remove the positive factors humans bring to research. Which include creativity, curiosity, intrigue, and discovery. In my eyes, that benefit does not exceed the risk.
5. The lesson I learn from this event regarding taking information at face value from an unverified source is that, you can't. Research always needs to be done. In science, there will always be a need to take a look at any situation from an alternate perspective. Though it is very tough to prove certain things in science, all theories and discoveries need to be proven the best way possible at that time. Also, they need to be retested with future developments in technology, just as in the case of the Piltdown discovery. Verification is always necessary.
After World War II, accurate testing for fossil aging was discovered. The flourine content of the find was tested, and the results showed that the bones were only 100,000 years old. In 1953, a ful scale analysis began, and it was found that the bones had been stained, pieces cut, and teeth filed. The jaw bone was actually only 100 years old and came from a female Orangutan.
Before this discovery, scientists found fossils in other areas that did not match the Piltdown finding and believed there to be a misconnect. However, allegations were never brought forth.
2. In this case, national pride negatively impacted the scientific pride. In general, just taking into account the human factor, self-pride, self-interest, the desire for fame and recognition, among other reasons, can make science unreliable. There is a need for obscure objectivity in science, which including the human side, can make science unreliable.
3. Positive aspects of the scientific process that were responsible for revealing the skull fraud included modern advances in fossil age testing, more development in the difference in fraudulent staining and natural staining, and being able to notice the difference in natural teeth grinding patterns and fake ones. Another aspect of the scientific process is comparison. Comparing the differences between fossils found elsewhere brought about the questioning of the Piltdown man.
4. I do not believe it is possible to remove the "human" factor from science. It can be reduced, but as long as a human is involved, there will be human error. Humans create the technology that helps prove that these fossils are a certain age, or ground a certain way; so humans can beat it. If there were a way to exclude the human factor in regards to error and fraud, I would definitely want to remove it from science. However, to removed the human factor from potential fraud, would also remove the positive factors humans bring to research. Which include creativity, curiosity, intrigue, and discovery. In my eyes, that benefit does not exceed the risk.
5. The lesson I learn from this event regarding taking information at face value from an unverified source is that, you can't. Research always needs to be done. In science, there will always be a need to take a look at any situation from an alternate perspective. Though it is very tough to prove certain things in science, all theories and discoveries need to be proven the best way possible at that time. Also, they need to be retested with future developments in technology, just as in the case of the Piltdown discovery. Verification is always necessary.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Locomotor Patterns
Lemurs:
(a) There is a variety of Lemurs that
live in many different areas of madagascar. However, the common
thread amongst all of their habitats is trees. Madagascar is a
beautiful island covered in forests and seasonal vegetation.
(b) The locomotor patterns of Lemurs,
are just a varied as their habitat. Some swim, some leap and some
move fast while others move slowly. For the most part however, they
can be divided between 2 categories; vertical clingers/leapers and
the aboreal quadrupeds. The leapers possess powerful back legs that
allow them to jump to neighboring trees, landing on their back legs
and clinging with their front paws. The aborreal quadrupeds move on
all fours, some slow in a sloth-like hanging position. Others more
quickly in an upright walking fashion.
(c) This locomotive patter evolution has
been greatly influenced by the Lemur's environment. This is proven by
the fact that each habitat has caused the Lemur to branch off into
different species in the same genus with a variation of locomotive
patters, and supporting limbs.
(d)
Spider Monkey:
(a) Spider Monkeys are found in the
tropical forests of Central and South America. The forests are
comprised of very tall trees. Spider Monkeys live in upper layers of
these trees.
(b) The majority of Spider Monkeys
climb, leap, or fly. Mostly, bipedalism, which means that the primate
only uses two limbs while leaping or swinging. These animals also use
quadrupedal motion while running, meaning that they use all four
limbs. Also, most climbing is suspensory; hanging onto the branch.
(c) The environment influenced this
animals locomotion because of the fact that they live so high in the
trees they must have strong back limbs to leap as well as a long tail
to assist with balance. Their long front limbs and hook-shaped hands,
also help them with hanging and suspending from the branches of the
tall trees. Furthermore, their long tail serves as a fifth limb,
assisting with suspension.
(d)
Baboon:
(a) The Baboon is a primate that lives
in East Africa. They are a greatly adaptable species that can live in
a wide variety of habitats. They are ground dwellers that tend to
sleep in trees or on cliff faces.
(b) The Baboon moves around quadrupedal
on their digits. Meaning that they walk on their toes, not on their
whole foot as humans do.
(c) The quadrupedal locomotor pattern of
the Baboon adapted from their ground habitat. Living in the plateaus
of Eastern Africa allowed them to develop limbs that would allow them
to forage the grounds, as well as climb to higher heights for safety
while sleeping.
(d)
Gibbon:
(a) Gibbons live in the dense areas of
Southeast Asia. Primarily in the trees; they rarely come down to the
ground.
(b) Gibbons are agile and acrobatic.
They move by branchiating, which swinging from branches and vines.
They use four fingers of their hands to hang onto and swing from
branches. They can also leap through the gaps in the trees and walk
on the branches on two feet with their arms in the air for balance.
(c) Being that the Gibbon lives high in
the trees, their long adapted limbs help them soar through the trees.
Also, they've adapted long arms for balance, as well as branchiating.
(d)
Chimpanzee:
(a) Chimpanzees live in rain forests,
both in the trees and on the forest floor.
(b) Chimpanzees move quadrupedally both
on the ground and in the trees. They also branchiate, swing and
cling, in the trees. Chimps are also capable of bipedaling or walking
upright, but only when necessary.
(c) Chimpanzees have adapted to their
environment by developing long arms for branchiating. They've also
developed knuckles that they can use for support. Since their arms
are longer than their legs, they use their knuckles for support when
walking.
(d)
4. Through the comparison of these five primates, it is obvious that environments greatly influence locomotor patterns both physically and behaviorally. In each case study, the different environment influence a different physical trait; longer arms, longer talk, supportive knuckles, etc. Each primate also developed a different way to maneuver it's environment. Those who live higher in the trees developed ways to swing from branches, and ways to keep their balance, like the Gibbon's holding their arms in the air.
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Homologus and Analogous
1.
Homologus Traits
a.
The human and the bat are both vertebrate
mammals. The human walks, talks, and lives an omnivorous life. The bat flies
and lives an herbivorous life.
b.
The bones of the front limbs of both humans and
bats are homologus because they are structured similarly and come from a common
ancestor among vertebrate mammals. The human has a front limb connected to a
hand, which has a purpose of grasping, holding, pointing etc. The bat has a
front limb attached to five digits as well. However, the bat’s digits form a
wing.
c.
The common ancestor between the bat and the
human is the vertebrate mammal. The first vertebrate possessed a skeletal
structure, which I s wear the forearm evolved from.
d.
2.
Analogous Traits
a.
The ape is a vertebrate mammal that lives on
land. The octopus is a cephalopod that lives only in the sea and has eight tentacles.
b.
Both the ape and the octopus have eyes. Eyes in both
species serve the purpose of providing sight vision and the structure of both
specie’s eyes are comprised of retina and nerve fibers.
c.
According to an article from the Harvard Science
department, the ancestry of the ape and the octopus diverged over 700 million years
ago. This common ancestor was a worm like creature with eye-spots not eyeballs.
This ancestor did not possess eye structures similar to that of the ape or the
octopus because they were not necessary. Over hundreds of millions of years,
the ape and the octopus developed eyes for the use of vision, thought the
development of these traits were different between the two species. Their parallel
evolutionary environmental stress for the need to see caused the parallel
evolution of the eye.
d.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)